lol, very insightful, but people said the same about the famas in BLOPS, try to stay close the said, and it didnt work, this is a legitimate option, but the fact is, most times you see a FMG9er, they are already in deathray distance, you have add in the fact that there are 1-4 other players in the match, an you cant anticipate them effectively, without changing your/my entire playstyle, in other words, you shouldnt have to change your playstyle or gun choice to combat a unbalanced weapon, ive been rocking your suggestions so far tho, im loving sykward sword,Super Mario 3D Land and still playing MH3.

If they do all of that nerfing to the FMG9 that gun would be as usefull as throwing paper balls at people. I personally hate the gun since everyone and their mother uses it.

I refuse to use the gun, the only time I'll pick it up is if I'm on a streak and my guns are out of ammo and I see it lying around. No joke it's only on Level 2 for me, everything else with the exceptions of the LMGS, Type 95, L118 and the PP90M1 are level 5 and above.

SR means Sniper Rifles and the glitch you are talking about was found in the first couple of weeks where you do a method (won't mention the moves) and your secondary weapon has no recoil.

I won't lie, I've done it a couple of times especially when I know I want to use it with the Degal.

As I said before, yes, this forum is meant to report issues in nice, respectful way. I agree to an extent. What I think makes everyone mad is the fact that they don't communicate with us. Not even a "we are aware of this and are working to fix it". No nothing. The first days the game was out WiiAdmin was doing an OK job, answering some questions here and there, but then the days went by and no other word was heard from them. My point is, like I've said many, many times, they can take all the time necessary to correct the issues; the most time, the better the fix (I guess?); but stay in touch with the community, answer more questions, let us know they ARE working to fix the game. And what perplexes me the most is that this could be done by a single guy/gal that monitors the forums periodically. I guess that they need all 70-something people to work in fixes (yes, I've counted them in the credits) but I don't think ONE person less will drastically affect them.

Exactly.