Buff_Hardthrust wrote:

 

 

This this this. Though I'd add that ALL akimbo is OP. If anyone has used akimbo scorpions, one might arguer they're even better than the FMGs since they have far less recoil. The only possible exception are the g18s due to short range. I'd also say the striker needs a tad bit more than just a fire rate cap.

 

But not to harp on this issue too much, I have another question:

 

Ghandi, will we possible see something similar to black ops where the person who put someone in final stand still gets the kill? 

 

(Though, personally, I feel no death streak should actually kill someone. Deathstreaks should always be something like juiced or revenge, in my opinion.)

Akimbo scorpions are definitely not as good as FMG9 Akimbo.  I've used them both extensively.  The akimbo scorpions WERE probably the better choice at first, as they had a hipfire spread of 1.5-6 (FMG9s were 2nd most accurate, but Scorpions were still #1) but a patch came out that made the hip-fire spread for ALL akimbo weapons exactly the same (a fixed 5-5 that increases only when shooting).   Scorpions had the hipfire advantage, but that patch actually nerfed the akimbo scorpions MORE than the akimbo FMG9s, putting them on the same level.   FMG9s still have insane damage per second output (0.054 TTK) and 36 round magazines.

The only secondary machine pistol I find to be appropriately balanced is the G18.  The other 3 need to be toned way down.

And yes I defintely agree on the final stand thing.  I remember I was one of the guys who got that whole fuss started on the Black Ops forums, leading to that change after rounding up enough people =)

Why do you people say there is no problem with lag compensation, just lag? I swear, this game and Black Ops are the first games I've seen something like that. In other games there can be lag, but everything will be synchronized anyway.

For example, take World of Warcraft. This game works fine even when your ping is 200+ ms. Say you are in combat with a player. The enemy casts two spells within some time. Because of lag, you can't see the time between spells. The spells will fly out the enemy at once. Lag makes you unable to see time between spells. But still, you see ALL spells he casts and the enemy will suffer EVERY spells cast by you, albeit with some latency.

New Call of Duty games are different: the artificial lag makes your bullets DISAPPEAR completely and HIDES enemy bullets. In older titles there was nothing like this. There was lag sometimes, but if you've shot some bullets at enemy, they WILL REGISTER even if you're already dead. There were numerous situations when playing with 1-2 bars when I shot first, died but still got kill. All because of lag, but lag DIDN'T REMOVE anything, just added latency.

i think of nerfing any weapon they should buff up the other weapons. Eg. the Type 95. imagine reducing its damage so its a 2 shot burst to kill or a 1 burst chest and up kill only. Your going to make it useless just look at the m-16. I agree about the 2 shot kill nerf but to nerf its damage enough would mean 1 less gun people will use. Nerfing weapons just makes the game more boring. Ak- 47 and cm-901 are really quite pathetic compared to the other AR. Ive gotten gold Ak-47 working on cm-901 i think ppl would agree that it need a buff. I felt like the AR in mw2 were way more balanced. They all killed fast as **** and had something unique about them. like the ACR was like a laser beam but it was weaker. Scar was accurate and powerful (2-3shot kill)but had a low clip and low ammo count. Tar -21 was powerful (2-3shot kill) and reg clip size but had recoil and a weird red dot sight. Famas and m-16 work pefect. M-16 was more acurate but had a worse drop off damage rate. Famas had better fire rate but less accurate. M4a1 was probably the most versitile gun. F2000 had shitty recoil but high fire rate and beast hip firing. Ak-47 (2-3shotkill)had a slower fire rate and had bad visiul recoil but was accurate and to me it seem to have better penetration and it was a badass gun to use. But in mw3 they made all the guns virtually kill with 3 bullets. Its so boring. i seem to get redicoulouse amounts of assist per game and triple and multi kills seem harder to get because it takes to many bullets. well thats all i have to say about the AR balances. ill glady respne to anybody who thinks otherwise and hopefully someone wold consider this.

i agree. lower it so it doesnt 2 shot kill but still make it a 3 shot kill at any distance. this could be balanced out by making less accurate so it would take more burst since not all bullets would connect. They just need to buff up the other weapons to type 95 standards instead of taking the easy way out and nerfing the crap out of the type 95.

GHANDI!

I repeat my post, if i can get an answer?

"

GHANDI, I cant still play your game because of lag / lag compensation.

For me every game its like in that video. Even the part with the Striker is not that unusual.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IySyljx3nEM

When will this be fixed, (not tweaked etc.) Fixed?

If its not gonna be fixed, can i get a refund? I bought your game simply for MP, and havent been able to play it properly at all.

"

Thank You!