I wouldn't mind having more attachments that don't conflict, at the very least in non-competitive modes like private matches or survival mode.

Examples:

- assault rifle with a silencer, RDS, and extended mags, masterkey

- LMG with RF, RDS, Silencer, ext mags

oh and that has the trololol song palying full volume on the enemy teams audio.

Actually no it still can not have lots of more weapons, there is a limit to how many the game can cupport; plus there is no need for lots more weapons. There does not need to be hundreds or thousands of weapons to choose from ever in this game series. Even with the fact it will be on the next gen console there will still be limitations to what the came can have.

There is more that play this game then that play BF on average, so that is one of main reasons for there not being dedicate servers on the consoles it is just not profitable and until it would be profitable there is no reason for them to do so. They are after all out for money and not just to make players like you happy about every thing.

Big maps make for slower games, people complained about slow games, so the maps were made smaller to compensate for this. See how well listeing to the consumers worked out...

Chipping away cover would not be of much use and would take up a tremendous amount of data to store that sort of animation and information that the consoles of even the next gen would not be able to handle it. The realism in this game is very limited beacuse of the limitaions of the consoles and even the next gen will not be so much better that they could handle this. Which is why BF does mass destruction and not just chipping away, or making small holes in walls.

Yes games may steal ideas from other games, but that does not mean that each game needs to have similar things from those other games ever. Each game should be as different as can be possible made.

It does not matter on how it was then for then is now the past and this is now. And they cater to the larger audience which is the general public that wants extravagent things and fun game play, not huge skill curves or large player skill gaps like you may wish for.

That is not true we elove not always because we are forced to do so but out of human nature to do so. So no a learning curve or skill gap is not always needed in a game. Plus games with large learning curves rarely sell as well as you may think. Go try EVE online if you want a game with a steep learning curve and large skill gap.

I did not fabricate anything, I simply stated simple facts about how many players are in today's gaming world.

A western style CoD? Been there done that. It is called red dead redemption.