Skip navigation
Up to Discussions in Forums
1 2 3 4 5 ... 11 Previous Next 7370 Views 102 Replies Latest reply: May 16, 2012 10:48 AM by LordCronos RSS Go to original post
  • Vanilla Ice is Gangsta Newbie
    Vanilla Ice is Gangsta
    24 posts since
    Jul 31, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated
    15. Aug 9, 2011 12:18 AM (in response to Vanilla Ice is Gangsta)
    Re: If Quickscoping is an exploit.....then why don't you use it?

    SuddenDeth13 wrote:

     

    Vanilla Ice is Gangsta wrote:

     


    Don't bring the shotgun argument into it either because you obviously don't know physics.



    So you want to bring in physics, something realistic?

    Ok, real snipers don't quickscope.

    Hurrrrrr.



    It is possible, shotguns however can't shoot over thousands of yards.

    Hurrrrr.

    Quickscoping in real life has nothing to do with physics but whether or not if it's possible which it is, just highly unlikely.
  • suddendeth13 Expert
    suddendeth13
    2,390 posts since
    Aug 25, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated
    16. Aug 9, 2011 12:22 AM (in response to Vanilla Ice is Gangsta)
    Re: If Quickscoping is an exploit.....then why don't you use it?

    Vanilla Ice is Gangsta wrote:

     

    SuddenDeth13 wrote:

     

    Vanilla Ice is Gangsta wrote:

     


    Don't bring the shotgun argument into it either because you obviously don't know physics.



    So you want to bring in physics, something realistic?

    Ok, real snipers don't quickscope.

    Hurrrrrr.



    It is possible, shotguns however can't shoot over thousands of yards.

    Hurrrrr.

    Quickscoping in real life has nothing to do with physics but whether or not if it's possible which it is, just highly unlikely.



    You missed my point. My point has nothing to do with the physics, it has to do that you're trying to use realism as an argument.
    Quickscoping isn't realistic.
  • Newbie
    zero2944
    59 posts since
    May 31, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated
    17. Aug 9, 2011 12:34 AM (in response to Vanilla Ice is Gangsta)
    Re: If Quickscoping is an exploit.....then why don't you use it?



    You missed my point. My point has nothing to do with the physics, it has to do that you're trying to use realism as an argument.
    Quickscoping isn't realistic.



    it is when a well trained sniper team is ambushed and is forced to engage multiple hostiles within CQB range and happens to have his rifle ready, fires point blank, drops his rifle, and pulls his sidearm to engage the rest, while his spotter is working with his support weapon (usually an assault rifle) to survive as best he can. that is realism
  • Vanilla Ice is Gangsta Newbie
    Vanilla Ice is Gangsta
    24 posts since
    Jul 31, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated
    18. Aug 9, 2011 12:35 AM (in response to Vanilla Ice is Gangsta)
    Re: If Quickscoping is an exploit.....then why don't you use it?
    This game isn't realistic but it has to keep a certain amount of it. If it goes to far outside of the boundaries of realism it turns into a sci-fi game like Halo.

    Quickscoping can be done in real life because it is a scope, you put your eye to it, whatever is in the middle of it will be hit at close range. Shotguns cannot hit anything at extreme distances though.

    Also, stfu.
  • Vanilla Ice is Gangsta Newbie
    Vanilla Ice is Gangsta
    24 posts since
    Jul 31, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated
    19. Aug 9, 2011 12:36 AM (in response to Vanilla Ice is Gangsta)
    Re: If Quickscoping is an exploit.....then why don't you use it?

    Zero2944 wrote:

     



    You missed my point. My point has nothing to do with the physics, it has to do that you're trying to use realism as an argument.
    Quickscoping isn't realistic.



    it is when a well trained sniper team is ambushed and is forced to engage multiple hostiles within CQB range and happens to have his rifle ready, fires point blank, drops his rifle, and pulls his sidearm to engage the rest, while his spotter is working with his support weapon (usually an assault rifle) to survive as best he can. that is realism




    Exactly, the M21 EBR is a sniper that can be used in more close quarters.
  • Vanilla Ice is Gangsta Newbie
    Vanilla Ice is Gangsta
    24 posts since
    Jul 31, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated
    20. Aug 9, 2011 12:38 AM (in response to Vanilla Ice is Gangsta)
    Re: If Quickscoping is an exploit.....then why don't you use it?
    REAL LIFE 360 no scope. It is possible therefore physics has no argument.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8tblVFUuT8g
  • Newbie
    zero2944
    59 posts since
    May 31, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated
    21. Aug 9, 2011 12:40 AM (in response to Vanilla Ice is Gangsta)
    Re: If Quickscoping is an exploit.....then why don't you use it?

    Vanilla Ice is Gangsta wrote:

     

    Zero2944 wrote:

     



    You missed my point. My point has nothing to do with the physics, it has to do that you're trying to use realism as an argument.
    Quickscoping isn't realistic.



    it is when a well trained sniper team is ambushed and is forced to engage multiple hostiles within CQB range and happens to have his rifle ready, fires point blank, drops his rifle, and pulls his sidearm to engage the rest, while his spotter is working with his support weapon (usually an assault rifle) to survive as best he can. that is realism




    Exactly, the M21 EBR is a sniper that can be used in more close quarters.


    true but the M21 EBR is not a sniper rifle, that is more of a spotters weapon, a sniper rifle by todays modern standards tend to fire either the .338 Lapua Magum, or the 50. BMG not a 7.62mm round
  • Vanilla Ice is Gangsta Newbie
    Vanilla Ice is Gangsta
    24 posts since
    Jul 31, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated
    22. Aug 9, 2011 12:41 AM (in response to Vanilla Ice is Gangsta)
    Re: If Quickscoping is an exploit.....then why don't you use it?

    Zero2944 wrote:

     

    Vanilla Ice is Gangsta wrote:

     




    Exactly, the M21 EBR is a sniper that can be used in more close quarters.


    true but the M21 EBR is not a sniper rifle, that is more of a spotters weapon, a sniper rifle by today modern standard tend to fire either the .338 Lapua Magum, or the 50. BMG not a 7.62mm round



    Point taken, I think the term used to describe it nowadays is 'Battle Rifle'. I could be wrong but correct me if I am.
  • asasa Master
    asasa
    5,389 posts since
    Oct 20, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated
    23. Aug 9, 2011 12:44 AM (in response to Vanilla Ice is Gangsta)
    Re: If Quickscoping is an exploit.....then why don't you use it?

    Vanilla Ice is Gangsta wrote:

     

    REAL LIFE 360 no scope. It is possible therefore physics has no argument.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8tblVFUuT8g



    LOLOLOLOL!
  • Newbie
    zero2944
    59 posts since
    May 31, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated
    24. Aug 9, 2011 12:45 AM (in response to Vanilla Ice is Gangsta)
    Re: If Quickscoping is an exploit.....then why don't you use it?

    Vanilla Ice is Gangsta wrote:

     

    Zero2944 wrote:

     

    Vanilla Ice is Gangsta wrote:

     




    Exactly, the M21 EBR is a sniper that can be used in more close quarters.


    true but the M21 EBR is not a sniper rifle, that is more of a spotters weapon, a sniper rifle by today modern standard tend to fire either the .338 Lapua Magum, or the 50. BMG not a 7.62mm round



    Point taken, I think the term used to describe it nowadays is 'Battle Rifle'. I could be wrong but correct me if I am.


    exactly right "M21 Enhanced Battle Rifle" origin from the Vietnam M14 Battle Rifle called the M21 for it's role as a dedicated marksmen rifle then enhanced with full rails and a collapsable stock for the EBR
1 2 3 4 5 ... 11 Previous Next

Actions

Bookmarked By (0)